Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: eims2000 who wrote (43279)	8/25/1999 6:00:00 PM
From: Bruce Denney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

eims, nicely written...the press will have a field day with this...as they should. SI, manifestly protects eg, smnn touts , and terminates members like Mary@Anthony...this is what si become. sad BD

To: eims2000 who wrote (43279)	8/25/1999 6:24:00 PM
From: Carolyn Horvath	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Well Said EIMS2000. I joined SI on Aug 3, below is a copy of my first post, and the reason I joined SI, to thank ANTHONY. Since I have 30 days to cancel with a full refund, it looks like this might be my last. SI CAN GO TO H*LL. To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (41965) From: Carolyn Horvath Wednesday, Aug 4 1999 10:47AM ET Reply # of 43282 Dear Anthony You are a gentleman and a scholar. I have been lurking for about a year, investing for 8 months, mostly "NO BRAINERS, MUTAL FUNDS"... Finally got brave and tried a small short, made a couple of bucks on your advice, THANK YOU, You are a breath of fresh air after trying to cover my butt dealing with SURETRADE, and Pump and Dump types. You, Wexler, Pavlov, TRIIboy and even HIS MAJESTY MR P$NK are very, very, good and gentle people,,,,,,,,,PLEASE KEEP SHOOTING THE RIP OFFS!!! I know you are busy, and I thank you for your time Carolyn Horvath & Joey Melling

To: eims2000 who wrote (43279)	8/25/1999 6:41:00 PM
From: Dr. Voodoo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

I agree. If in fact A@P is terminated I would like to share my opinion as someone who has been a casual observer and recent poster to the A@P thread. First and foremost, I have never seen A@P behave in a manner that was less respectful than what was delivered to him. Furthermore, I can think of a half thousand other members of SI whose behavior is far worse. >>>Besides, SI has deterioated to such a large extent that it is about time that they be exposed for what they are.<<< A bunch of ninnies afraid of a lawsuit? SI mgmnt: Grow up, we're all adults here and can take care of ourselves. There is no point in removing someone who contributes FAR MORE GOOD than your defined alleged harm. SI used to be a place where personality was part of what made it interesting and fun to read. It was part of the reason I joined. I especially liked the fact that people with skill and intellect unselfishly shared some of their knowledge. Now many of these people no longer share because of fear that their actions could cause themselves harm. What a shame to lose that to some other place on the net. I for one am fully aware of the pitfalls of taking opinions too seriously. But my opinion is that, if this continues, my presence on SI both as a lurker and contributor will certainly be less, as I can find better places to spend my time. Good day, V