To: johnd who wrote (28712 ) 8/25/1999 7:02:00 PM From: Teflon Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
jd, there are numerous ways in which the organization could set this up. There is no "one way" that it would occur. A common arrangement would involve MSFT contributing the Assets of the Interactive Group into the new business vehicle(probably a newly formed 100% owned subsidiary), getting 100% of the equity in return for such consideration. (Let's assume the new venture was to be called "MSN" for the purposes of this post) Then MSFT would offer the employees that were to follow MSN the option to stay with MSFT or leave and go with the new venture. Those that chose to stay would be relocated to the newly opened Greenland Office, and those that chose to go with the MSN would probably be given the option to swap their outstanding options in MSFT for a "similar in value" options package in MSN. More than likely these shares would share the vesting characteristics of the former MSFT options forfeited, but with some tweeks depending on the individual. There are other scenarios which could be presented, this is just one option. Once the group was established that was to take MSN to market, MSFT would go through the rigors of setting up MSN as a separate operating entity, then go through the process of filing the Registration Statement for an IPO. Depending on the number of shares and percentage ownership that MSFT retains (as compared to shares set aside for employees, sold to other investors privately, and ultimately sold to the public through the IPO) MSFT may or may not have to consolidate MSN into its Financial Statements for financial reporting purposes. Usually, if MSFT owns less than 80%, they could structure the relationship so that they wouldn't have to consolidate -- this is usually dictated by the level of direct control that MSFT is able to exert over MSN. The more control Gates and MSFT has, the lower the acceptable level of ownership MSFT is allowed to retain without having to consolidate. My gut feel is that they'd come in somewhere around 65%-75% by the end of the IPO. Once the MSN IPO goes public, MSFT would have the option of (1) holding onto the shares of MSN where in that case we as shareholders derive value from the rise in MSN's share price indirectly through the unrealized gains sitting on MSFT's balance sheet, or (2) MSFT declares a dividend and distributes shares of MSN directly to its shareholders based on some percentage allocation in which case we realize the appreciation in MSN directly. I hope this was helpful :) Teflon