Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (59178)	8/25/1999 7:57:00 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<Nothing I have ever said or anything I believe states that I should or would mistreat any woman, ever.>> You are right there, you don't abuse your wife do you? Just asking as you are one of those Muslims that pezz worries about. Now for shits and grins, if you lived in say, Iran, would you give your wife the freedoms she enjoys now? Even if it meant death to both of you?

To: one_less who wrote (59178)	8/26/1999 2:40:00 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Thank you, brees....I think the exchange speaks for itself...

To: one_less who wrote (59178)	8/29/1999 10:44:00 PM
From: pezz	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 67261

<< Nothing I have ever said or anything I believe states that I should or would mistreat any woman, ever.>>...Well I have believed to the contrary for quite some time. So I decided to do some research on this .......... And to my surprise I could find no posts to support these views...I had used this quote ...<< establish a system for punishing someone for taking a "human" life or interfering with its development,>>......Well this was taken out of context......The full quote went like this..<<I think you are absolutely on target. If you then want to use the structure of the legal system to say, if you can't prove the existance of a human soul, then you can't establish a system for punishing someone for taking a "human" life or interfering with its development, I think you are absolutely on target>>. ... For the “you would mistreat woman for not following your views" comment I cannot find any evidence. Consequently it would seem that your criticisms of me were them selves "on target." FWIW I do owe you an apology. Thus I am doing so I was wrong and admit to being wrong.. .......I have not changed my thinking on Islam in general. pez

To: one_less who wrote (59178)	8/29/1999 11:04:00 PM
From: pezz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<< Good job neocon!!>> What a sap you are! These guys don't give a damn about you or your religion. This is just a continuing war of words between myself and them. Neocon is embarrassed because I pointed out his lack of response to Johannes.......Suresuresuresure He finally responded after I chastised him...... even then in the mildest fashion possible...Ish is still pissed about our PBA argument....He sends a PM to Johannes........ssssssh don't want anybody to know........What a joke! Only after I call him on it does he act like a man! JLA says Johannes “should apologize”...I guess that's telling him! They are pals and they are using you. And you don't have enough character to call them on it.............. At least you know where I stand. pez