SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joey Smith who wrote (69922)8/26/1999 1:26:00 AM
From: Petz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573124
 
joey, re:<Charles, you might want to revisit your "Intel is a dog" campaign when you compare the cost/performance of Coppermine with Athlon.>

Whether cost is $50 or $100 is almost irrelevant if you have a speed grade one or two higher than your competitor, since it'll have 80%-90% gross margin anyway, and sell for $100 - $200 more.

I'm sure Intel would rather have an extra 100 MHz than costs that are $50 lower, don't you agree?

Petz



To: Joey Smith who wrote (69922)8/26/1999 1:51:00 AM
From: Charles R  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573124
 
<you might want to revisit your "Intel is a dog" campaign when you compare the cost/performance of Coppermine with Athlon. >

I am keenly aware of that metric - K6 was miles ahead of PII/III on that metric and probably will be miles ahead of CuMine on that same metric - that was the metric that ensured that AMD remained a dog all these years. In case you haven't noticed, to the winner of the MHz race go the spoils.