Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: William Peavey who wrote (8423)	8/26/1999 1:23:00 PM
From: Jeff Mizer	Respond to of 9818

<<You'd think she'd be getting a bonus, instead of the boot, for getting Citibank's computer systems Y2K compliant.>> >>>> . . .perhaps she didn't get them truly compliant, and someone's figured that out? My speculation only, but it reminds me of the IT officer at Microsoft electing to take a sabbatical a month or two back. <<<< Isn't it something how NOTHING can come out that some people on this thread find troubling ? This is just one more very big clue that something is amiss... There is no doubt to me that Y2K is going to be big trouble -- the only question for me is will it just be economically or will it really threaten our cushy lifestyle. However that said --panic does no good... prepare the best you can for a moderate crisis and hope or pray depending on your beliefs that it turns out for the best. Like I have said many times-- my disagreement with some has been that if it ends up in the worst case scenarios no amount of preparing is enough. Personally I am just going to be glad when good or bad --April is here and the wait is over. Jeff