Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edwarda who wrote (53209)	8/26/1999 1:13:00 PM
From: Starduster234	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

May I join the two of you???? :-) SD

To: Edwarda who wrote (53209)	8/27/1999 9:58:00 AM
From: Father Terrence	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

That is all well and good, but I would be willing to bet that if you could remain who are are -- right now -- and could retain all your life experiences up to this point, you would not hesitate if you could "push a button" and return to the way you were physically when you were 18 to 21 years old...

To: Edwarda who wrote (53209)	8/28/1999 2:19:00 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

<<<Unlike you, I am not married so being the object of sexual attraction does have some significance,>>> Bizarre, Edwarda! I know you don't REALLY think that being the object of sexual attraction has no significance to a married woman (or man, either)! I mean, the implication is that being sexually attractive to one's spouse is of no importance; and also that if one isn't f@cking others, it follows that one doesn't want to be the object of sexual attraction to others. Even if one were to be above such promiscuous desires for their own sake, one can hardly help but notice that one's spouse is turned on by the obvious interest of other men in what is his alone. Especially if one's husband is sexually attractive to other women, I think a married woman (who cares whether he strays) would be ill advised to rest on her former laurels. (But I agree, the allure of teenagers is not of concern. It's the allure of intelligent novelty one needs to be smart about, if, as I said, one cares.) What I just wrote is un-PC. I'm mentioning that in case someone thinks I don't know it.