SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (70003)8/26/1999 2:08:00 PM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 1573214
 
Re: "but you (and PB) replied with BS. Not good."

Ali, they are agreeing, they're just adding that .05V isn't much at the end of the process's life, compared to .2V in midlife for the K6.

EP



To: Ali Chen who wrote (70003)8/26/1999 2:13:00 PM
From: Process Boy  Respond to of 1573214
 
Ali - <Maybe because 2.00 was to little to let the majority of the cores run at 600 ?">

Of course.

<but you (and PB) replied with BS. Not good.>

What BS? Intel obviously raised the voltage .05 to obtain 600. This is obvious.

PB



HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News