Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (3306)	8/26/1999 4:13:00 PM
From: DanZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Kevin, It is clear that you will twist any story to fit your agenda. Like Bill, you avoid discussing the real issues by diverting attention to other things. It is irresponsible and unethical to allege a fraud that you know you can't prove just because you don't think a company will sue you. I have no interest in debating this with you or anyone else on this thread and will not respond to any more posts here. It's a waste of time. Bye.

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (3306)	8/26/1999 5:30:00 PM
From: Iceberg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

>You are alleging Bill has committed libel, ergo, the burden of proof is upon you. Kevin, I'm not so sure about that. As a crude analogy...the press has alleged and/or questioned George W. Bush about cocaine use in the past. In the absence of court proceedings, the 'burden of proof' has NOT been on the press, but upon the presidential candidate himself - IMO, that is as it should be in the absence of actual court proceedings. And to date, George hasn't defended himself to most people's satisfaction. It remains to be seen how this will eventually play out. But I can tell you one thing...cartoonists, as published in national weekly magazines, are having an absolute field day with this issue. Similarly, Bill, and to a much lesser extent than Bush, hasn't adequately defended himself either. So it seems to me your "burden of proof" accusation vis 'a vis Dan's post is totally bogus and completely without merit. If I were a cartoonist, I could imagine all sorts of side-splitting and hilarious scenarios applicable to Bill's activities. Ice