Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : C-Cube -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Craig Gordon who wrote (44175)	8/26/1999 10:24:00 PM
From: John Rieman	Respond to of 50808

IBC starts in two weeks. C-Cube will launch products there. Last year it was the DVx transcoding DV and MPEG. This year, its the next generation, and products based on last year's chip. I don't know if the market will blink, but there should be new wins announced.................. www2.digitalbroadcasting.com{06494661-5587-11D3-9A5E-00A0C9C83AFB}&Bucket=HomeFeaturedArticles

To: Craig Gordon who wrote (44175)	8/27/1999 8:59:00 AM
From: stockbug	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 50808

What I Want Want To Know Is why Are We Down From 37 Since Early July. If anything things are better, the company had slightly better than expected earnings, one analyst was positive stating the company deserved a higher multiple for valuation, and everyone is talking about the improving DVD market. So why Are We At 27 3/4. The only thing I have seen to cause it are the low price speculation comments made here and on other boards suggesting the stock price should be lower because the posters think it should be lower. Not one has given a fundamental reason for why it should have dropped. The company has made no negative comments that would have justified the drop. And lets say Smith Barney is pumping Zoran, so what, Cube has more supply contracts in place as well as other lines of business to benefit from than Zoran. So unless someone knows a reason for this cannibalization of stock price I suggest the low ball valuation comments need to stop so small investors will not be convinced into panic selling just so some short seller can make a buck at their expense.

To: Craig Gordon who wrote (44175)	8/27/1999 11:17:00 AM
From: Stoctrash	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50808

..yes..Craig you are correct... ..trade this flaming dog like the little bitch that she is. ..usually..before any news good or bad comes the blocks show up..that's what I'm watching and lately they are selling 25K blocks thanks to AB's little behind the scenes chat the last few days. "dudes...we're not kicking ass yet...low end revenues, no blow out...see if you can hold it up, my ass is grass if it tanks again" LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!! BTW...Intel news Divit posted on the BRCM thread is neat. Might be time for BRCM short again on the FUD factor of that. I got a short TA signal on it this am.