SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: robnhood who wrote (14226)8/26/1999 10:57:00 PM
From: George Papadopoulos  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17770
 
state sponsored journalism...talking about forcing our democracy there or what?

NATO Plans Kosovo Media Censorship Operation
Foreign Affairs Front Page News Keywords: KOSOVO, NATO, MEDIA,
CENSORSHIP
Source: New York Times
Published: 8/16/99 Author: Steven Erlanger
Posted on 08/16/1999 13:37:46 PDT by antiwar republican

NATO Peacekeepers Plan a System of Controls for the News Media in
Kosovo


August 16, 1999

NATO Peacekeepers Plan a System of Controls for the News Media in Kosovo

By STEVEN ERLANGER

P RAGUE, Czech Republic -- The United States and its allies charged
with peacekeeping in Kosovo are establishing a system to control
the news media in the province that would write a code of conduct
for journalists, monitor their compliance with it and establish
enforcement mechanisms to punish those who violate its rules.

A draft plan of operation for Kosovo's Department of Media Affairs,
which already has been established, was drawn up earlier this month
by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, calling
for a staff of 50 people.

It has been circulating on a restricted basis to member countries,
who have been asked to nominate suitable personnel. A copy was
provided to The New York Times by someone disturbed by the
contents. International news media groups also have heard about it
and already have expressed criticism.

A senior Western official involved with the plan, who spoke on the
telephone from Kosovo, said it was based on a similar program in
Bosnia-Herzegovina. The proposed "Media Regulatory Commission" and
"Media Monitoring Division" are not intended to intimidate or to
censor the local news media but to support and tutor them in the
ways of a Western free press, he said, until they can operate on
their own.

"The idea is not to censor anyone," he said. "The idea is to bring
people up to Western standards, so you need to present Western
standards to observe. And it will all be done in consultation."

On the other hand, he said, the department is charged with
preventing "the abuse of the media, especially radio and
television, so it can't be used to urge people to go out in the
streets and create riots."

But in Montenegro and Serbia, which together make up Yugoslavia,
Clinton administration officials are actively engaged in supporting
politicians and news media outlets opposed to the continued rule of
the elected Yugoslav President, Slobodan Milosevic. In Serbia they
are helping the opposition to organize large street demonstrations
intended to press Milosevic to resign.

The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe is charged
by the United Nations, which is in overall control of Kosovo, with
the "democratization" of the province, including running free and
fair elections. News media development is a crucial part of the
organization's task, the officials say.

The Kosovo Media Affairs Department, situated in Pristina, the
province's capital, is most urgently charged with allocating
frequencies and issuing broadcasting licenses for Kosovo. Various
businessmen, publishers and potential politicians are already
drawing up plans for new television and radio ventures for the
province.

The department proposes to create a Media Regulatory Commission, in
part based on America's Federal Regulatory Commission, which
governs the airwaves. But the commission would also write (in vague
consultation with Kosovo journalists) and administer a
"broadcasting code of practice" and "a temporary press code" for
print journalists, and then "monitor compliance and establish
enforcement mechanisms," the plan says.

As in Bosnia, the commission would have the right to censor
material, to fine stations or to order certain journalists or
stations off the air.

A "media monitoring division" would follow the content of local
journalism, report on compliance with the codes of conduct and
"track the treatment of journalists to insure freedom of expression
and movement as well as responsible behavior by journalists."

The plan calls for the appointment by the United Nations of an
"international appellate body," to which local news media could
appeal decisions or rulings by the commission.

There would also be an "independent media council" of local
journalists and civic leaders, also appointed by the United
Nations, to "advise" the Organization for Security and Cooperation
in Europe.

The department also plans to name new management for Radio
Television Pristina, the former Yugoslav state television and radio
outlet in Kosovo, and to turn it into "a public-service
broadcaster," with programming in Albanian and Serbo-Croatian. When
it was run from Belgrade, the Yugoslav capital, it also used to
broadcast in Turkish.

"This arrangement," the draft plan says, "will also assist" the
U.N. mission in Kosovo "in its urgent need to communicate directly
with the population on matters vital to civil administration."
Eventually, the station, along with the Media Regulatory Commission
and all its powers, would be handed over "to duly constituted
Kosovar authorities."

According to the plan, the Media Department will also take
responsibility for coordinating international donors to the news
media, including private or nongovernmental agencies, while making
recommendations of media outlets worth sponsoring. It would also
work to develop a nonpartisan news agency for the province and to
establish a journalism school.

Media watchdog groups are critical of the plan. Marilyn Greene, the
executive director of the World Press Freedom Committee, a group
largely financed by American publishers and the Newspaper Guild,
said: "The infringement of press freedom is obvious. Unfortunately,
the lessons of Bosnia -- how not to operate a reconstruction
program -- were apparently not learned."

Bosnia was an extremely difficult case, said the Committee's
European representative, Ronald Koven. "But hard cases make bad
laws," and journalists are bound to feel pressure "to adopt certain
kinds of codes."

"There is a kind of colonialist mentality," Koven said. "Foreigners
are going to impose their standards and codes of conduct on
independent media journalists in Kosovo in a situation where before
the war there was a perfectly adequate independent
Albanian-language press that knew what it was all about."

He cited a forthcoming study of foreign media management in Bosnia
by professor Monroe Price of Cardozo Law School, Yeshiva
University, who wrote, "The time to intervene or control propaganda
is when brutality is imminent," not to protect the political
environment afterward.

"The line between information intervention and censorship becomes
blurred," Price wrote. "One of the great dangers of international
action to restrict free speech is that it provides apparent
democratic justification for any nation to use its police power to
close down media outlets."




To: robnhood who wrote (14226)8/26/1999 10:58:00 PM
From: George Papadopoulos  Respond to of 17770
 
humanitarian bombs still killing...

Friday, August 13, 1999 Published at 06:03 GMT 07:03 UK

It is two months since Nato bombs stopped raining down on Kosovo, but
they are still killing people.

[INLINE] As many as 20,000 unexploded cluster bombs are thought to be
scattered about the province.

Every day, somebody - often a child - is killed or injured.

Altin Kelmendi is just nine years old, but he has already been
deprived of so much.

[INLINE] [INLINE]
Click to watch Orla Guerin's full reportThanks to an unexploded Nato
bomb, he is a double amputee, living between a wheelchair and a
hospital bed.

His cousin, Adem, was a victim of the same device.

Adem told us he cannot imagine going home again.

"How can I go back, without my legs?" he said.

Nato busy elsewhere

[ image: Children mistake cluster bombs for toys]
Children mistake cluster bombs for toysBritish troops showed us the
remnants of a cluster bomb.

To children, the bright colour makes it look like a toy, but Nato is
in no hurry to take the bombs away.

Bomb disposal team Sergeant George Drysdale: "We are only called to
actual sites that concern K-For troops, so we are not in the business
of humanitarian clearing, there are non-government organisatons that
come here to do that."

The Russians were clearing Pristina airport this week, though it
wasn't a textbook exercise manhandling a 600-pound bomb.

Elsewhere in Kosovo, local people are trying the same thing, and dying
in the process.

Learning about the dangers

[ image: ]
Aid agencies are doing what they can. These days, normal lessons can
wait.

The most urgent need is to try to warn even the youngest children
about the dangers all around them.

Aid workers are using learning games to try to protect the children
against what Nato left behind.

It's the best they can do. It will be years before all the hazards are
taken away.

Nato attacked

There is a great deal of anger here that Nato is not doing more.

Roland Schwanke of Medecins Sans Frontieres: "They should collect what
they dropped here, because we find aircraft bombs and cluster bombs
nearly every day.

"For the de-mining organisations it is too much, and Nato dropped them
so they should collect them as well."

Aid workers they fear the casualty toll will continue to rise,
especially in the winter when the young ones start looking for
firewood.

No-one ever came to warn Altin until for him and Adem, it was already
too late.



To: robnhood who wrote (14226)8/26/1999 11:04:00 PM
From: George Papadopoulos  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17770
 
More on the Albanians...MUST read!

KFOR: Repeating history
Foreign Affairs Editorial Opinion (Published)
Source: Washington TImes
Published: 8/11/99 Author: Nikolaos A. Stavrou
Posted on 08/13/1999 19:50:15 PDT by Antiwar Republican

Untitled Document Operation Allied Force has been a resounding success
for Kosovar<br
ab>diplomacy and sets the stage for a prolonged American quagmire at a
place were guerrilla warfare and anarchy were invented. With the
apparent
toleration of KFOR a "state within a state" is fast becoming a reality
in
Kosovo, while porous borders with Albania assure an uninterrupted flow
of
weapons. Secure under the NATO umbrella, some enterprising KLA
elements
have reverted to lucrative smuggling activities, while others are busy
setting up parallel administration in Western Macedonia -a prelude to
a
liberation movement there.

Leaving little to chance, KLA's Washington supporters hold fast to the
victim image to assure "understanding" of its murderous activities.
When
it comes to blond Balkan Muslims, Western journalists have shown a
great
deal of understanding. Rapes of Serbian nuns are reported as
"assaults,"
and daily murders, abductions and disappearances are packaged as
"understandable" acts of revenge.

Decades of sound investments in the American political process paid
off for
KLA. A careful examination of FEC list shows a steady flow of Albanian
PAC
and personal contributions to prominent political figures of both
parties.
Now, as the Sarajevo gathering affirmed, it is the turn of the
American
taxpayer to foot the bill for NATO's "humanitarian intervention" in
defense
of separatism.

Kosovar diplomacy had history as its guide; its American counterpart
had TV
images. The KLA meticulously followed a policy first tested in the
Balkan
wars (1912-13) and refined in two world wars. Albanian elites would
instinctively claim victimhood in their pursuit of powerful patrons to
settle scores with their neighbors. The United States follows in the
footsteps of a long list of Balkanizers who made military power
available to
the perennial Balkan underdog. The Ottoman Empire, Benito Mussolini's
Italy,
Nazi Germany, Josef Stalin's Soviet Union, and Mao Tse-tung's China
all paid
their dues to the project of "Greater Albania." An Albanian proverb
aptly
defines the Kosovar views on power: "The big, the powerful and the
strong
are servants of the smart, the short and the weak." Yet, their choice
of
allies did not always serve them well. Faithful service to the Sultan
cost
them Kosovo in 1912. In fact, it was an Albanian general, Essat bey
Toptani,
who surrendered the province to the Serbs. A Harvard-educated bishop
and
politician, Fan S. Noli, misread the importance of V.I. Lenin's Russia
when
he invited Comintern agents to help him replicate the Bolshevik
Revolution
in Albania. Two decades later, Albanians of all ideological
persuasions
joined Mussolini and Adolf Hitler in their Balkan adventures. For a
short
four years, matters looked promising and Albanian enthusiasm for
fascism was
unabashed. Hitler's U-Boats and Mussolini's air force were routinely
referred to by Albanian leaders as "our forces," and banner headlines
in the
press heralded their victories. For example, Tomori in April 1942
joyfully
announced "our navy destroyed an American armada in the Atlantic";
Bashkimi
i Kombit headlined the "Successes of our air force in Malta and the
Corinth
Canal" with the subheading "Greece cut in two." Sixty-two thousand
Albanians eagerly marched into Greece with Mussolini's blue shirts. In
their
enthusiasm, the commanders of the Albanian brigades, Drini and Dajti,
requested the "honor" of crossing the Greek borders first. Many
prominent
communists, among them Ramiz Alia, (secretary general of the Communist
Party) started their careers as fascists. Omer Nishani, first
president of
communist Albania, had fashioned himself as the theoretician of
fascism. But
when his fascist past surfaced at the Paris Peace Conference, even
V.M.
Molotov blushed.

Albanian elites and tribal leaders saw the same opportunities in
fascism and
Nazism that their descendants now see in NATO. "If we organize and
discipline ourselves according to the dogma of Albanian fascism,"
wrote
Nishani, "we will achieve our hearts' desire of expanding Albania to
its
ethnic borders."

Under the fascist-Nazi umbrella, the Albanians gained control of
Kosovo,
efficiently cleansed it of 300,000 Serbs and kept the Yugoslav
resistance
busy, thus relieving Nazi troops for duty in Normandy. History repeats
itself. Under a different patron, the Kosovars are now cleansing the
territory of non-Albanians. Why not? NATO gave the Yugoslav army only
days
to get out of Kosovo, but it is "negotiating" with the KLA about what
weapons to surrender and when. In the meantime, ancient Orthodox
Churches
are destroyed and innocent farmers massacred by NATO's local allies.
Madeleine Albright and Tony Blair may still harbor illusions about a
multi-ethnic Kosovo, but that is not what Albanians have in mind.
Their goal
is "an ethically pure Albanian Kosovo," and they are pretty close to
achieving it.

Since KFOR's arrival, the Serb and Gypsy populations have been reduced
by 75
percent and 90 percent respectively. The irony is that the Serbs who
are now
being expelled are those who thought they had no reason to leave their
ancestral homes. They had nothing to fear, they thought, because they
had
committed no crimes against their Albanian neighbors. Above all they
opted
to trust NATO, only to be brushed off with the excuse, "We cannot be
everywhere, all the time."

Nikolaos A. Stavrou is a professor of international affairs at Howard
University.
_________________________________________________________________

1 Posted on 08/13/1999 19:50:15 PDT by Antiwar Republican
[ Reply | Top | Last ]
_________________________________________________________________