Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Starnet (SNMM)Online gaming, sexsites, lottery, Sportsbook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tool dude who wrote (6556)	8/26/1999 10:58:00 PM
From: Techplayer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8858

too; dude. I am sure that the management of the company will appreciate your supportive comments. (only own a few shares...)brian

To: tool dude who wrote (6556)	8/27/1999 9:01:00 AM
From: RKHIII	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8858

Tool dude: NOW they're dope fiends and drug addicts. Where did that come from? Hey, I'm not about to defend any of these guys for being pillars of the community; this biz is full of lowlife scum. But, at least they were trying to get out of the porn end and become more legitimate, if that's how you can categorize gambling. But I can't help but think that most of this was simply a setup. Was SNMM potentially vulnerable? Yep. They probably weren't keeping tight enough reins on some of their dealings and employees. But were they guilty of everything for which they are accused? I doubt it. Even the Mafia hasn't ever faced this many diverse accusations. And where is good ol' Claude in all this? Strangely quiet. I think it's a vendetta, pure and simple.