To: E. Davies who wrote (14953 ) 8/27/1999 2:51:00 PM From: yihsuen Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29970
As long as the accounting practice following the legal guideline and the annual report audited and signed by legitimate CPA firm, I don't know what could be a better way to present the amortization of Excite (and iMall) assets to make briefing.com happy. Does Yahoo or CMGI, acquisition hungry, prepare their statements differently? Anybody would put on its best cosmetics on their financial statements in front of financiers. Business needs to survive on positive cash flow. No matter how good your products are or how bright a future you have, without cash, you're dead meat (take a look at the embarrassing situation of Iridium). ATHM's current assets is around $538 millions, not great but OK, debt yes but not heavy. ATHM business model relies lightly on Accounts Receivables, and close to none inventory. Excite and iMall deals were a stock swaps, the biggest concern for shareholders is share dilution. This won't hurt ATHM cash flow unless... YES... THE PERFORMANCE OF EXCITE ASSETS TANKS and bites into the cash reserve. This has been the hottest topic on this thread for the past few weeks. I don't want to get into the discussion on Excite performance, I know nothing more than you do. Excite seems to be doing fine last quarter, and the future? You guys are the experts. A close look at briefing.com's article seems like they built this enthusiasm of following Excite's financial before it acquired by ATHM and just carrying that hobby over after the acquisition. CSCO bought two piece of properties yesterday and paid roughly 70~80 times of their current sales. Chamber expects to cash in big on them in 5 years. If I propose ATHM investors with that kind of patience on its portal investment, they probably will hang me. <g>