SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (70038)8/27/1999 9:42:00 AM
From: grok  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573592
 
RE: <The issue isn't stability at 600 MHz. Stability at 600 MHz is FINE. The issue is stability at 650 MHz. For the first time in a long time, it's tough to overclock an Intel chip by a mere 8% and still keep it stable.>

I think that Intel has mastered the art of testing micros to determine their highest speed with fine granularity. This may sound easy but it's not. Most people over test in order to ensure that they don't ship parts that fail under some rare condition. Intel has so much experience with P6 core and with binning in general that they can now extract every MHz from their chips and not leave anything on the table. This means that top of the line chips won't over clock worth a darn.



To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (70038)8/27/1999 7:15:00 PM
From: Petz  Respond to of 1573592
 
Kevin, re:<Now, it may be that AMD has cherry picked parts and sent them to Tom>

I've thought of that, but don't forget his Intel PIII-600's were special chips with no multiplier lock. Where on earth did he get them suckers! I would think the only source is Intel, and they would definitely want to cherry pick parts being sent to Herr Uberclockmeister.

Petz