To: Mr.Fun who wrote (9311 ) 8/28/1999 12:25:00 PM From: Frank A. Coluccio Respond to of 21876
Excellent analysis, Fun (which, not surprisingly, means that I agree with you). The DWDM void in CSCO's current arsenal is real, but I believe that this is due to their willingness to wait out what I perceive they believe is a technology "chasm stage." I sense that CSCO realizes that an acquisition of a plain vanilla DWDM solution at this time (most current solutions are just that, with some vendors introducing embellishments through kludgy Layer 3 add-ons) would soon result in their having to do catch up with an obsolete solution, when future, more organically-defined optical solutions arrive. Perhaps they will grow Monterey into some form of stop-gap solution, like they did with StrataCom on some level, in the meantime. IMO, CSCO is wise to be biding their time right now, allowing for a plateau in the state of the art to be reached, without necessarily plunging into a very costly commitment at this time. At least that's my take on it. In the interim, they will continue to partner on enterprise DWDM-based solutions as they are now on an individual case basis [in some situations], with established OEMs and others. During the chasm stage there is still ample visibility for the "older world" approaches - to say the least - to sustain their current sonetized platforms, a point which I make in the second of the two links below, and, as their acquisition of Cerent clearly implies. I appreciate your amplifying on the following point. You did so a lot more eloquently than I took the time to do, earlier, at the time of the announcement (see links below). "6. IMO this is a clear indication that Cisco has backed off on its "Conversion to IP (rather than convergence), voice will be free" rhetoric. Cerent is a TDM company. Its greatest virtue is the ability to integrate IP, ATM, frame and circuit onto a circuit-based TDM SONET architecture. In an all IP world you do not need Cerent... This $7B deal is, in a way, acknowledgment that "old-world" technologies will be with us for a long, long time." From two of my previous posts on the matter: Message 11072751 techstocks.com Regards, Frank Coluccio