SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : PARANOID! TIRED OF TALKING TO YOURSELF? LET'S TALK(TTP) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (423)8/27/1999 12:03:00 PM
From: Arthur Radley  Respond to of 626
 
Rich,
I'm with you.....no problem with this dilution issue. Considering they only have about 15 million shares out, institutional holdings represent 34%(tells me that someone has done some serious DD on this stock)and this little jewel only has a market cap of about $150 million. If! And I do mean IF. If Zomaril is the drug we think it is and with Novartis spending over $100 million on trials they must think the same, then the revenue alone for TTP would equal the current market cap. Now tell me, how many companies have a revenue stream and market cap the same?

Back to the dilution issue. This will provide a source of funding without the perils of other type funding and will give the retail customer a chance to put more common shares in their hands.

I haven't taken any money off the table, but "congrats" on your winning hand.(:>)



To: scaram(o)uche who wrote (423)8/27/1999 4:45:00 PM
From: RCMac  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 626
 
>>an estimate of $600M/year for ilo is very reasonable, and a decent rate of penetration could be expected. 25% of that is TTP's.<<

Hmmm. 25% = $150 million, as a royalty flowing right to the TTP bottom line. Well now.

Current shares outstanding 15.4 million; add 1.2 million for the S-8 you mention and 6.1 million from exercise of the outstanding warrants, and add 2 million (a guess - the 10-K on Edgar oddly doesn't have this and I don't have the hard copy annual report handy) for employee options; this adds up to 24.7 million shares.

$150 million divided by 24.7 million = $6.07/share for Zomaril/iloperidone alone (not counting anything for Pivanex, any of the cancer vaccine programs, etc.).

Gee, put a PE of 35 on $6.07, and you can imagine a stock price of about $210, a 25-bagger from here. If this is five years out and you discount at 50%, you get a present value of about $27.60/share. If you discount at 40% (high, but not so super-high risk), the PV is about $39/share. All higher if you assume a higher PE, and/or you use a lower discount rate.

Or: Assume some R&D expense on the other programs, and some SG&A, call this (arbitrarily) $40 million, leaving net of $110 million, or $4.45/share. etc.

Just some idle arithmetic, applied to some possibly not-so-idle dreaming on a pleasant afternoon.

Again, thanks Rick, MZ, et al. (I'm hanging on to my TTP warrants, bought mid-January at average cost about 5/8, for a while yet, for the reasons outlined above.)

-- RCM