SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (36209)8/27/1999 2:38:00 PM
From: Thomas C. White  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71178
 
<grin> 44 percent?? I like that in a woman. Not too shabby Coby. Keep workin' on it...

But - 21% sex with someone whose name they didn't know? Well, I assumed they meant you had to know her last name too <sly smile>. Does this strike you as too high a percentage? Or too low?

As to burning oneself intentionally, again it's an issue of strict definition. When I was a kid, at summer camp we occasionally played a game where each of us would hold a finger over a match to see who could keep his finger there the longest. As opposed to actual self-mutilation.



To: Ilaine who wrote (36209)8/27/1999 2:52:00 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 71178
 
26% I did pick up some nice ideas though.



To: Ilaine who wrote (36209)8/27/1999 11:13:00 PM
From: ZinMaster  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71178
 
13% - my lucky number?

Not bad, considering I haven't been in jail for more
than one night at a time. This is one purity test
where I would not want to aim for zero. It seems that
the test varies somewhat...there was no question on the
one I took for "sex with a group of nuns"...just as well.
I wouldn't want to explain that one.

And, yes...it *is* embarassing to have to ask the name of
the woman you just woke up with....for both of us.

After hearing many the investing stories shared on this thread,
I hope you all answered YES to "gambling with other people's money".