Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JRI who wrote (66918)	8/27/1999 7:00:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 132070

jri, no spinning necessary. I make a lot of calls. Some are right, some are wrong. I max my gains on the right ones and minimize the wrong ones. I was totally right on Intel as it fell to the 50s, made huge profits, and have been wrong about the retards liking its bad numbers and taking it back up again. On Dell, I've been right all along. The $38 number you are talking about was on the way down from the 50s and I sold and rolled my puts many moons ago and for several months have been saying it was due for one more dead count bounce. IBM I have been wrong on in the last 6 months. Sometimes getting the fundamenals 100% right can hurt your judgement and that has been the case here. I am still surprised that the herd is falling for Louis's scam, but suckering in they are. Similar with Micron and my gain of nearly 4000% on the puts has been cut to 3400% due to this helium balloon. I still think fundamentals will out as they have every year on this bowwow and I will make another 1000%+ gain on this one. But, the Elaine comment doesn't make sense. She is talking the market. I am talking individual issues. The question there is what has changed in her model? And the only thing that has changed is not stocks being more fairly valued, but her firm having a difficult time selling reality to bubble heads.