Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (59213)	8/27/1999 9:13:00 PM
From: gao seng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Another cover-up exposed WASHINGTON, Aug. 27 (UPI) - A group of independent investigators says their analysis of recently obtained radar images lends support to the theory that there has been a government cover-up in the probe into the 1996 crash of TWA Flight 800 off Long Island, New York. The Flight 800 Independent Research Organization (FIRO) and the Associated Retired Aviation Professionals said at a news conference today that their analysis of the radar data pokes holes in the federal government's conclusions that the disaster was caused by a fuel tank explosion rather than a missile fired either by a terrorist or, accidentally, by a Navy warship or plane. In the report issued by FIRO, the FBI, CIA and National Transportation Safety Board were criticized for what the investigators saw as misleading conclusions about the crash that killed 229 passengers and crew. The presentation, which stretched some three hours, came up with little in the way of a smoking gun that would prove any of the missile theories, and was aimed more at the evidence that was used, and not used, by the official investigators. The analysis of the air traffic radar images from Islip, N.Y. provided two routes of attack on the fuel tank explosion scenario. It aimed to cast doubts on the accuracy of a CIA computer simulation that showed the doomed plane rapidly gaining altitude immediately after the fatal explosion, a scenario that has been used to explain the fiery streak flying into the sky that some witnesses on Long Island reported seeing. It also indicated a good deal of air and surface activity around a restricted military area, dubbed W-105 by the Navy, which was activated the day of the crash. Thomas F. Stalcup, a member of the Florida State University physics department and the head of FIRO, said tracking the new radar images shows the Boeing 747 picked up speed in its final moments, meaning the aircraft was descending rather than climbing, which would have caused it to lose speed. ''It is clear to see that the radar data doesn't follow the simulation data,'' Stalcup said. ''The conclusion can be drawn that the plane did not climb.'' The radar information also provided a wider view of the area where Flight 800 went down, showing some 30 ships sailing in formation and patterns that could indicate an active naval exercise. The ship that attracted the most attention was an unidentified blip that crossed the airliner's path at about 30 knots a short time before the crash. The ship, which Stalcup said was larger fairly large, has never been identified and continued sailing toward W-105 as the airliner went down. What was unusual about the activity around W-105 picked up by radar, Stalcup said, was the seeming lack of reaction by the ships and planes to a fiery explosion that should have been clearly visible to the crews. None of the ships altered their course or seemed to make any effort to head for the scene to offer assistance. ''It would have looked like the sun was setting,'' Stalcup said. ''It would have been a huge ball of fire in front of them.'' Before the news conference, Reed Irvine, the head of Accuracy in Media, said any role the Navy might have played in the crash would probably not be revealed by anyone in the Navy because no one would be willing to risk their military career by talking to the media. Accuracy in Media organized today's news conference. Implicating the Navy in the downing of an airliner and any supposed cover-up, however, did not seem to sit well with some of the retired officers on hand to represent the Associated Retired Aviation Professionals, including retired Adm. Thomas Moorer, a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Moorer said the Navy is not in the habit of firing missiles without knowing where they are going. ''We don't fire a multi-million dollar missile willy-nilly,'' he said. ''You have to have a target.'' ''I don't think you are going to get to the bottom of this,'' said Moorer, who said the final word on Flight 800 would have to be determined through Congressional hearings that would have the clout to compel testimony from government officials. ''You have a lot of evidence and no final decision.'' marketwatch.newsalert.com