Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 2000: Y2K Civilized Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeff Mizer who wrote (427)	8/27/1999 9:51:00 PM
From: Cheeky Kid	Respond to of 662

You don't read my posts right? Read back Jan and Feb this year. You will see my stance on Y too Kay. I get sick of telling people my stance over and over again. Never said there was no problem, just MASS paranoia. Massive government, state, city, company, corporate cover up? Ya right! BTW ALL my computers are Y2K compliant. All office equipt is compliant. One office program is not compliant, but it does not affect the job it does. Y2K doom and gloom is sickning!!!

To: Jeff Mizer who wrote (427)	8/28/1999 12:40:00 AM
From: foobert	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 662

Perhaps to gain a strategic advantage? You asked: <<<<Why would some companies spend hundreds of millions ?>>>> Maybe they recognized that their IT infrastructure was old, even obsolete, and had known Y2K issues. By examining this infrastructure, correcting problems, replacing old hardware and software they not only get the reassurance that they will be able to function in year 2000 and beyond, but that they will also be more efficient and productive. At the same time any competitor that does not take appropriate action will fall by the wayside. Does it not occur to anyone else that the billions of dollars spent on Y2K are not just to fix the problem, but also to modernize and improve the IT infrastructure? And the resulting side effect of that overhaul may yeild an improvement in the economy. Comments please.