Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ORXX - Orex Gold Mines Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (981)	8/27/1999 11:31:00 PM
From: Laser	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2392

Zeev, Haber admits to the required "tweaking" to perfect the economics of the operation. Should be interesting to see what transpires over the next while.

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (981)	8/27/1999 11:37:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Respond to of 2392

The Haber processes may be 15 years old to you, but they are brand new to Ga Bard. This makes all past failures at commercialization "old news"-- of course (g). We can all now sit back, relax, and let Ga Bard find new and different ways to pump this baby to the moon. - Jeff P.S. Sadly, I am ethically prevented from investing in OTC:BB stocks I don't like, even when I'm pretty sure I can make some good money in doing so. So, for fun, put me down as a paper investor at the ask, .12.

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (981)	8/27/1999 11:46:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2392

Zeev, I respect your opinion and you forthright integrity. I also understand the Haber and the historical bad vibes that has been associated to it. I am believing more and more that the bad scenarios might be the reason for whay this stock fell. I do not know enough about mining to amount to a hill of crap ... But the tape convince me to wait for testing and the reputation of Mr. Blackburn. I have also talked to Mr. Haber and he is a strange gentleman but that is expected because of his expertise. The bottomline is I am in this stock because of the fall. I got caught and did the DD to see why it fell and I cannot see why it did. I did a bit of DD and discover the HGP which was suppose to be a possible potential scenario. I figured I could wait for it and try to figure out the trading and the fall. Now other than that I would not have gone as far with the DD if not for the naysayers and there posts. 4 weeks later I have a summary because of the verification of the nays. DO I have doubts ... absolutely but nothing I can prove. Do I trust anyone ... NO ... but I trust b/w figures and trading logs. Remember b/w figures do not lie only liars figure. I hope everyoe uses common sense but I have uncovered some interesting scenarios which if the nays had gone qwuiet probably would have never gotten this stock so noticed. I appreciate you more than you know and I do consider all scenarios .. pro and con. :-) GB