Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony@Equity Investigations,Trade picks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Colin Cody who wrote (233)	8/28/1999 10:12:00 AM
From: Art M	Respond to of 255

Colin, My post was to Bryan, not you. If I wanted to post to you I would have done so. Please stop harassing me by telling me 'to get a life'. Thank you.

To: Colin Cody who wrote (233)	8/28/1999 10:13:00 AM
From: jjs_ynot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 255

Colin, Almost every poster that I know has violated these terms at one time or another. If advertising other sites or entities is a violation, there are some that are ongoing and continued violators. E.G. Jenna and here continued advertising of her market letter, Steve Harmon and advertising his investment management service, Steve Goldman and his Yamner brokerage, Daniel Miller and his age problem. Many, many posters have violated the spamming rules when they got overexcited about a specific stock. I have used these as examples not to single out these individuals (these are good, honest, well-intentioned individuals in general); but to merely point out rampant and regular violation of the Terms of Use. There appears to be more than a little "Selective Enforcement" here. Thus, more specifics are needed by the posting public to understand and explain this selectivity. FWIW, Dave

To: Colin Cody who wrote (233)	8/28/1999 11:45:00 AM
From: Art M	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 255

Colin, In some of your posts on the 'IRS, tax related strategies -traders' thread you refer people to a site traderstatus.com that offers books for sale for $200.00 and phone consultations for $100/half hour. Could this, possibly, be a violation of the terms of use for SI? When I clicked on the techstocks.com I got a message saying 'Sorry, but we can't find the document you requested', so I don't know if including the link to traderstatus.com is a violation of the SI terms of use. Thanks, Art