SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Knight/Trimark Group, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brasco One who wrote (3687)8/29/1999 12:10:00 PM
From: Gary Korn  Respond to of 10027
 
Brasco,

Thanks. I wish this thread would become more active. I think one reason the stock trades at a 1999 p.e. of 20 (even though the First Call forward growth estimate is 35%) is that, while people are used to seeing the "future" prospects of this or that tech stock, they are not accustomed to seeing the future prospects of a financial services company.

In many ways, though, NITE is like a high tech stock, one with very many prospects. The OLBs just got it started. Intelligently, and hopefully not to late, NITE management knew to target other markets so as to cover the risk of slowing OLB growth.

The growth markets are there for the plucking: institutions (just 500 clients now, that is a pittance), international institutional growth (and, heck, international OLB growth), options, outsourcing of market making activities by established entities. Saavy management indentifies and rapidly targets these new opportunities, which is what I believe NITE is doing. There was a comment by KP somewhere along the line to this effect, i.e., that we (NITE) need to move to quickly target growth opportunities. If they can execute, we'll all benefit.

Gary Korn



To: Brasco One who wrote (3687)8/29/1999 1:08:00 PM
From: Gary Korn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10027
 
NITE certainly has an up-to-date web page vis-a-vis earnings estimates. While Bloomberg shows a 3Q average estimate of .41, and WSJ shows Zacks at .41 as well, NITE's web page already shows the new average of .39 (as well as the new reduced 1999 estimate of 1.58). Just one sign that these people are on top of it.

Gary Korn