Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Starnet (SNMM)Online gaming, sexsites, lottery, Sportsbook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Uncle Clive who wrote (6760)	8/30/1999 8:09:00 AM
From: Uncle Clive	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 8858

Another rather interesting difference of fact pointed out by the Search Warrant document lies in the child porn allegations. On August 26th, Dohlen stated : I can confirm that in connection with the investigation, a low level employee revealed to authorities that he was in possession of what the employee characterized as illegal child pornography," Dohlen added. "This individual was immediately dismissed from the company for cause. Starnet management reiterates its condemnation of child pornography and emphasizes that the company has in place policy that forbids such illegal commerce by this organization." On page 60 of the police document , the informant is referred to as a consultant of a client of Starnet who was employed by them for 18 months. His statement indicates that his access to the Sizzle site was provided by Jason Bolduc who provided him a staff demo access code or password. While on the site, this consultant employed by a Starnet customer, viewed the area containing child pornography. This statement from the consultant was provided on July the 27th, 1999. This consultant and the low level employee as described by Dohlen, don't seem to Jive.