Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : C-Cube -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stoctrash who wrote (44257)	8/30/1999 1:37:00 PM
From: stockbug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50808

It is one thing to post it, it is another to insist it is true and claim by calling the company we would find it was true.

To: Stoctrash who wrote (44257)	8/30/1999 1:49:00 PM
From: PaulW	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50808

Cameron and stockbug - I subscribe to Zacks and just checked my E-mail. They sent to me a notification of a downgrade by Fahnestock on August 18th. Do you think you get the same information for free on Yahoo and other free sites that I pay for - the Yahoo site is at least a week behind the paid Zack service. If you look at the Yahoo research site and look at the average recommendation rating this week, it was changed - it probably was for the the Fahnestock downgrade - reported a week plus later after it was sent to paid subscribers: biz.yahoo.com Also on Yahoo and Zacks and Bloomberg there are different arrangements with different securities firms. Just look at this site - notice how many firms are actually covered by Yahoo services: biz.yahoo.com Why would I pay for Zacks when the information is free - simple it is at least a week older when it is for free with lots of firms unless the firm has an arrangement with a free service, and lots of firms do not even have a free arrangement. So for my money, I pay for Zacks and have an advantage over you and others that use free sites.