Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : KASTEN CHASE APPLIED RESEARCH. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Professor Dotcomm who wrote (971)	8/30/1999 2:25:00 PM
From: Ruby	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1247

remember VERSAPATH

To: Professor Dotcomm who wrote (971)	8/30/1999 3:12:00 PM
From: Ichy Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1247

Professor Dotcomm said: "Who is going to be in charge of Springboard? I have to think that Springboard would be a more attractive instrument than KCA. At least it is a pure play on something we all know about" I have been bothered for days about the reasoning behind this split, because the idea that it will be less expensive, just doesn't sit well with me. OTOH if someone in the subway/train business wanted to take over Kasten Chase in order to get the communications technology, the rest of the company wouldn't interest them at all. Is it possible that management are just ensuring that when someone tries to buy out the communications technology, they can sell Springboard and still keep Kasten Chase, and their jobs intact? This is just supposition, and I have no real reason to think this except it is the only solution that makes sense to me.....