SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Starnet (SNMM)Online gaming, sexsites, lottery, Sportsbook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockDung who wrote (6802)8/30/1999 6:01:00 PM
From: dbernet  Respond to of 8858
 
ISN: In terms of these charges that might be laid, what is the
worst-case
scenario we might be looking at?

SNMM: There are a couple of subsections in the criminal code under
202 that
they are looking at. Our feedback has been that typically a first
offense
under this section is a $200 fine. There are obviously a few factors
that
go into sentencing in our case if we were found guilty: we operated
openly,
we were in a gray area at worst, that we were cooperative, but on the
other
side we do things in great magnitude here. We expect at worst for it
to be
a small fine.




To: StockDung who wrote (6802)8/30/1999 9:39:00 PM
From: Techplayer  Respond to of 8858
 
floyd, they said in their 10k (that is pronounced ten kay) that this was a questionable area in internet betting. even you could put 2 and 2 together. they basically TOLD the cops where to look.

Brian


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News