Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Leap Wireless International (LWIN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Biker who wrote (475)	9/6/1999 10:58:00 PM
From: Lance Bredvold	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2737

FCC considering change of rules to accommodate large national providers with bundled services. I would think Leap would prefer limited spectrum for several players in each of their smaller markets. I would prefer that too. Means I have more choices than buying AT&T's offering or USW's offering. A few months ago Sprint PCS indicated they would not be needing more spectrum (I believe) and they are not quoted here. If spectrum is authorized willy nilly, it could eliminate some of the advantage CDMA has over the other air interfaces which require more. Though presumeably systems which needed more would have to pay for it and still be somewhat disadvantaged, I would rather see inefficient systems find themselves unable to offer additional services. Bell Atlantic is quoted as needing more though they don't seem to be indicating they need it as urgently as Bell South does. L. "BY AARON PRESSMAN WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Federal regulators are considering relaxing the limits on ownership of wireless telephone licenses to help cellular carriers roll out new Internet and data services, industry officials said Friday. The Federal Communications Commission is expected to consider as early as a Sept. 15 meeting a staff proposal to relax limits on the amount of wireless airspace a company may own in a single market, they said. Under current limits, a company cannot own more than one of the five high-capacity wireless licenses in each market. That has left some of the most popular carriers overwhelmed in big cities and unsure how to start offering new high-speed Internet services that are incompatible with today's phones. If adopted by a majority of the agency's five commissioners, the staff plan would immediately allow a carrier to own two high-capacity licenses, or up to 55 megahertz of the airwaves, in smaller and rural markets. Combinations could include one older 25 megahertz cellular license with one of the newer 30 megahertz Personal Communications Service (PCS) licenses, but not two high- capacity PCS licenses. For larger markets, the FCC may begin waiving the limit on a case-by-case basis if competition would not be diminished and a ``public interest' benefit would be served. The Justice Department's antitrust division would continue to review deals for possible harm to competition, as well. Such staff proposals form the basis of FCC actions, but can be changed before being approved. The expected Sept. 15 vote could also be delayed. Industry officials and analysts welcomed the plan, but said much more was needed if carriers were to begin offering so- called third-generation cellular service, which allows much faster wireless Internet access, while still providing ordinary telephone service to millions of existing customers. ``There are more and more applications demanding more and more bandwidth,' said SoundView Financial Group analyst Timothy O'Neil. ``Every carrier is pushing the limits today.' BellSouth Corp., one of the carriers asking the FCC to eliminate the cap altogether, is working to squeeze greater amounts of data into its existing spectrum, but still sees a need for more airwaves. ``It's not a matter of if, but when it takes off,' said Keith Radousky, director of engineering for the company's wireless unit. ``The demand for wireless data will outpace technological improvements in efficiency.' At Bell Atlantic Corp.'s mobile unit, new spectrum is needed just to satisfy the growth in existing services over the next 4 or 5 years. ``The spectrum cap would prevent us from growing our existing services,' said Bill Stone, executive director of network planning. ``Throw 3G and high-speed data in there and we blow right through the cap.' The FCC is also considering designating a new section of the airwaves for third-generation wireless service. Such new bandwidth would have to be auctioned in a process that could take several years, but would eventually allow carriers to roll new services and keep existing customers happy at the same time. Not everyone in the wireless industry favors raising or eliminating the current spectrum limits. The Personal Communications Industry Association, made up of mostly of smaller PCS carriers, has so far successfully convinced the FCC not to go farther and raise the limit in big markets. ``The FCC a few years ago found that having just two carriers in a market was not enough,' said PCIA vice president Mary Madigan Jones. Eliminate the cap and, ``the large guys would just gobble up a lot of spectrum,' she said."