Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (70493)	8/31/1999 6:53:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574096

Re: "<about 800MHz Coppermine> stable, high bin split. " PB, did you let something slip you shouldn't have??? EP

To: Process Boy who wrote (70493)	8/31/1999 7:08:00 PM
From: Steve Porter	Respond to of 1574096

PB, Elmer - <800 MHz Coppermine demoed without any special cooling.> For the record, no jacked up voltage or special configuration either, i.e. stable, high bin split. Just for the record. I say AMD can beat that on .25 Have a good one. Steve

To: Process Boy who wrote (70493)	9/1/1999 3:54:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1574096

Elmer and all - <<800 MHz Coppermine demoed without any special cooling.>> I would like to clarify one thing a bit just to hopefully avoid confusion: 800 is probably not quite ready for market. That should be obvious since all references to Coppermine release have a "7" as the first digit. However, there is nothing special relative to the demo about the 800 demo chip. It was not a one of kind "ringer". Hope that helps anyone who might have taken my earlier statement to mean something that wasn't intended. PB