Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dayuhan who wrote (53685)	8/31/1999 6:54:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

I disagree. People have been using it on people since the invention of the sharp stick. As for using [guns] on the public ... nobody does that except the extremely rare spree shooter. But our media don't let us ever forget those spree shooters. Unless they were uniformed, like the ATF gents in Waco. What we have here is the moral fallout of idea management. Propaganda. "Follow the money." In this case, power. Civil gun ownership is unappealing to those who are accumulating power, because it is an inherently distributive force. You make it sound like you are entertaining the fallacy of identifying gun ownership with violence. This startles me since I usually see cleaner logic from you, Steven. I am interested by your choice of words. Why "people" vs. "the public"? The relative value judgment is built right into the phrase. Loose cannon (pl.) vs. the common good.