Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rick Jones who wrote (70519)	9/1/1999 12:08:00 AM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574001

Rick, <I thought this discussion thread was for adults, but you seem to take this stuff very personally.> Yes, this discussion is for adults. The difference is that an adult usually is capable to get the point, and not to change subject of discussion. <Our repartee' has consisted of a combination of facts and personal opinion.> No, your view is too simplistic. Who cares about your opinions? What are you doing is repeating half of well-known facts with INTERPRETATION which is half-correct. I tried to present for you the other half of the interpretations. However you appear to be absolutely inflexible and unable (or rather don't want) to get it. <If any of your statements/opinions have validity, it is certainly lost in the childish sloganism that you resort to if you don't agree.> I am sorry for my level of English sloganism. I am learning from masters of "verbal engineering" like P.Engel. In case if you did not notice, my other reply is: Message 11123536 Please point me to any part which is below your perception of adult level (except the last phrase of course). Your motivation to enter the AMD thread is also unclear. <I just felt like adding my thoughts to the board.> Feeling lonely or what? And what exactly are your thoughts besides the monikers that were around all time? Why would you decide to share your wisdom about the puny AMD? Aha, here is the answer: <Am I long INTC? - yep, AMD? - nope.> Between the lines it means that you have decided either to "help" your AMD shorts by representing FUD only and "scaring" participants by stressing strong sides of competition only, or recruit more rally-suckers into overvalued INTC (my opinion!) in order to sustain the stock price. This is usually a non-publicized motivation of other dirty anti-AMD posters like Yousef, Elmer, and Engel. I dislike this. I hope to be wrong in your case. And again, just cannot resist: <with lots of facts being conveniently ignored.> Like enormous level of non-accountable labor compensation at Intel which gets expressed in common stock buy-backs?