Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike M who wrote (3390)	9/1/1999 3:00:00 AM
From: BDR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

An up day and the shills are back and kickin' ass.

To: Mike M who wrote (3390)	9/1/1999 11:03:00 AM
From: BDR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

<Dale I hope you are short the stock and not just writing to see yourself in print...I really doubt you have that courage of conviction, however... > If you have been reading my posts, and I know you have, you know that I do not hold a position in this stock. I have no particular opinion regarding the company now and wasn't particularly interested in the issue until the longs started making false claims that the science behind the product had been proved by submission of data to the New England Journal of Medicine for publication. That sent my personal shill-o-meter needle into the red zone. We have been over this subject before. Since you have made it a big issue I will follow up on it until either the article is published or until it is clear that it isn't likely to see the light of day. As I have also said, the product may sell very well in the absence of publication of the study. It could sell well in the absence of any sound science to support for that matter, the power of marketing being what it is (see today's press release).