SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (39231)9/1/1999 11:36:00 AM
From: 16yearcycle  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
Lindy,

How are you going to handle this? Let us know. Thanks.



To: LindyBill who wrote (39231)9/1/1999 11:38:00 AM
From: mthomas  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
You know, big chunks for sale from a couple fund managers dump the price on a sure thing, just so they can buy back in.......did we not see what happened in the spring, rose like 30+points in a single day?
Or am I not remembering correctly? Dump the price on already known information, get the sell stops to kick in, get the momentum players to bail out, buy at the best price and come out the short term with 5%+ gains......am I being unrealistic? Have I not seen this before?



To: LindyBill who wrote (39231)9/1/1999 11:49:00 AM
From: SpudFarmer  Respond to of 152472
 
LindyBill: True, in the past margins and infrastructure were the two major factors which caused "reversal of fortune". One factor has been eliminated. The other could be to increase market share, or just increased competition. Price erosion doesn't make sense if demand is sky high, unless suppliers are increasing prices due to high demand, and Q not passing along the increase.

BTW: I love roller coasters, all types.