Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (87579)	9/1/1999 12:04:00 PM
From: Burt Masnick	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Re:Re: ""I would sell the stock" -- Dan Niles, self-proclaimed INTC axe, about $30 ago." I can see a lightbulb beginning to go on in Dan Niles head that is saying something like "Oh - just knowing the numbers for the current quarter isn't the entirety of pricing equities. Reasonably realistic future prospects also figure in. Whoda thunk it?" When do you think we'll hear the "Ohmigosh I was mistaken speech"? Regards, Burt

To: Paul Engel who wrote (87579)	9/1/1999 12:09:00 PM
From: Felix Appolonia	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul Re- "Damn Niles must live off his salary - and NOT his investments." These analysts live day to day or quarter to quarter. They don't have a clue with respect to the big picture. Their employers should pay more attention to their mistakes and bad advice, and they should be held accountable for their bad investment advice on when to buy and when to sell stock.

To: Paul Engel who wrote (87579)	9/1/1999 1:33:00 PM
From: Dirk Dawson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Paul, Can you help me decipher this PR: "Intel didn't let the thrown gauntlet go unchallenged. At about the same time, at an Intel developers conference in Palm Springs, Intel CEO Craig Barrett announced that the ``Coppermine' Pentium III processor, an enhanced version of its high-end chip, will be released in October. It will operate at a speed of at least 700 Mhz - more powerful, but not necessarily faster, than Apple's 500 Mhz G4. " What does "more powerful, but not necessarily faster" mean? Dirk