Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MythMan who wrote (59827)	9/1/1999 3:13:00 PM
From: Giordano Bruno	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

suckers rally? charts.quotewatch.com

To: MythMan who wrote (59827)	9/1/1999 3:15:00 PM
From: eddie r gammon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

I see you finally got around to opening your e-mail. Nice pair of lips on that sucker wasn't it (g) erg

To: MythMan who wrote (59827)	9/1/1999 3:16:00 PM
From: Ken98	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

Looks like they ramped it about 45 dow points on less than 10 million shares. The other indexes appear to be happily tagging along, albeit at a slower rate.

To: MythMan who wrote (59827)	9/1/1999 3:26:00 PM
From: pater tenebrarum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

the eagerness of the BTD's is appalling...

To: MythMan who wrote (59827)	9/1/1999 5:04:00 PM
From: paulmcg0	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86076

Speaking of the bond market, today's activity really puzzles me. Take a look at cnnfn.com . Perhaps someone can explain to me why US Treasuries are yielding more than corporate bonds with the same time frame. For example, this table (from September 1) shows 10 year Treasuries yielding 5.97% while AAA rated corporate bonds are yielding 5.70%. This doesn't make sense -- I thought Treasuries were supposed to yield less than corporate bonds, because they are not as risky.