Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike M who wrote (3400)	9/1/1999 7:31:00 PM
From: BDR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

<...until the longs started making false claims that the science behind the product had been proved by submission of data to the New England Journal of Medicine for publication...> Reread the statement. Read what is there, not what you, in your paranoid state, want to be there. I did not say that Zicam does not work or that the study is fraudulent. Read the following very slowly for content and meaning: The long's onetime claim that the science behind Zicam has been validated by the mere submission of a study to a prestigious medical journal is a false claim. It proves nothing. I am still waiting for the paper's publication before I draw any conclusions about Zicam's efficacy. And I will await sales figures before I draw any conclusions about the future of GUMM. And even after that information is available I doubt I will take a position, long or short, in the company. It doesn't interest me as an investment.