SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Petz who wrote (70643)9/1/1999 6:28:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575190
 
<The fact that the demo did not use "exotic" cooling does not mean it didn't use, say, a Peltier, ...>

Petz, come on. Accusing Intel of mincing words, President Clinton style? Is it very hard to believe that this may have been a cherry-picked 800 MHz part? That it didn't need anything more than a standard heat sink and fan?

<The demo machine did not have to run 24/7. The demo machine only ran its demo software -- any disclousure here?>

I think you're running out of arguments here. Like I said before, Process Boy has much better visibility of Coppermine than anyone else here. He thinks that Coppermine is very scalable in frequency. If he's right, why is it so hard to believe that Intel can produce any reliable 800 MHz parts, much less a big handful of them for employees to play with? (Lucky them.)

Of course, a "big handful" doesn't qualify as enough parts to warrant the release of a new speed grade, but it does mean that 800 MHz demos like these can be done without smoke-n-mirrors.

<I predict that AMD will release, and a Tier 1 will announce use of, a 750 MHz Athlon within 48 hours of Intel's CuMine 733.>

Not an unreasonable prediction, particularly since it usually takes a month before an AMD release makes it into the hands of everyday people.

Tenchusatsu



To: Petz who wrote (70643)9/1/1999 11:23:00 PM
From: Time Traveler  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575190
 
Petz, you are still caculating in favor of AMD. Well, I could not blame you to do so. I was calculating in favor of Intel, too.

The difference between you and I is that I realized that my calculation was totally out-of-the-ball-park, and I stopped.



To: Petz who wrote (70643)9/1/1999 11:31:00 PM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1575190
 
Petz - <I predict that AMD will release, and a Tier 1 will announce use of, a 750 MHz Athlon within 48 hours of Intel's CuMine 733.>

I wouldn't be surprised. I would probably call it an announcement, rather than a release, until availability was established.

PB



To: Petz who wrote (70643)9/2/1999 1:41:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575190
 
Petz - Re: "I predict that AMD will release, and a Tier 1 will announce use of, a 750 MHz Athlon within 48 hours of Intel's CuMine 733. "

It doesn't take much for an OEm to "announce use of" an AMD chip.

Just look at that BLOW-OUT launch yesterday - for the 500 MHz Kdawg 62.

AMD had...well, just ONE OEM - IBM to "announce PLANS" to use the chip.

What a ringing endorsement from the entire PC community !

Paul