Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John T. who wrote (24459)	9/1/1999 10:35:00 PM
From: bobby beara	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99985

John, over the last couple of days i have heard one analyst or market timer after another give a bearish read or say they are in a sizeable cash position, that along with this put/call development seems to put a big question market on the bearish case. A break above the recent high on the McClellan oscilator would be bullish. bb

To: John T. who wrote (24459)	9/1/1999 10:50:00 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

John, the only thing that negates a bullish reading is the low premium or implied volatility in most option. IMHO this is as important as the P/C ratio itself. There is no justification for those stock levels at such a high interest environment and I think we are moving into a period were to be contrarian to the contrarian may make sense. BWDIK Haim

To: John T. who wrote (24459)	9/2/1999 2:05:00 AM
From: Andy H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

I, too, have kept daily stats on the CBOE put-call for over 15 years. Today's action surprised me, particularly since I took a rare day off and only now am reviewing today's stats. However, I read in TheStreet.com that MSFT today had an annual rollout of put options written in conjunction with its buyback program. According to the article about 100,000 puts were traded by MSFT on the CBOE today, which skewed the volume ratios. In all my years of tracking these numbers, I can't recall such a high ratio on an up day that did not follow a crash type day. I don't like to make excuses for the numbers, but today I will make an exception and not treat it as bullishly as it appears.

To: John T. who wrote (24459)	9/2/1999 8:06:00 AM
From: pater tenebrarum	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99985

John, you asked me to comment on the extremely high one-day p/c ratio yesterday: normally, such a high ratio is considered bullish, especially on an up day. however, there seems to have been some distortion due to the very large trade in MSFT puts someone has mentioned already, and put volume on index options was not particularly high. in fact index options trading has lately given me the impression that complacency is still very high. there has been an increase in individual equity put buying in recent sessions that can be ascribed to hedging by a few scared money managers...you know, the 'fully invested bears', of which there are many. many market commentators have pointed out that the various sentiment measures, such as the investors intelligence and consensus inc. polls as well as the relatively high p/c ratios suggest that a bottom is near. this is correct as long as we can safely assume that the market is in fact still in a bull trend. this is however open to debate, as a measly 38% of NYSE stocks are still above their 200-dma's, in other words, the majority of stocks is in fact already in a bear market. what's more, earlier this year, the percentage of bullish advisors hit a 12-year high, and in my experience, this percentage tends to top out before the market does. so the decrease in the advisors' bullishness does not necessarily indicate that it is now safe to turn bullish - after all, not all of these advisors are complete idiots, and they react to the things that are there for all to see, like the terrible a/d line divergence ,the NH/NL and rising interest rates. for a bull market to end, a change in bullish sentiment is a precondition to some extent... i would also like to add that the fact that there is cash on the sidelines is also not a watertight guarantee for a rally...after all, this cash may well remain on the sidelines. just look at Japan, which has the highest savings rate in the world. nowhere else has there been so much cash on the sidelines for such a long time - it didn't keep the Nikkei from falling 60% from it's high. in 1929, the investment trusts had mountains of cash at the time the market reached it's highs...in fact, they had a lot more cash, relatively speaking, than the mutual funds have today. nevertheless, the market crashed. there is a lot more cash that is invested already, especially from abroad. European and Japanese institutions have taken up the slack from the decline in U.S. mutual fund inflows this year, and if a falling dollar puts a question mark over this prop for the market, we could easily see a sudden rush for the exit. i would argue however, that if the dollar manages to reverse and the bond market does not break through it's recent lows, we have the ingredients for a powerful rally. in short, i am not entirely convinced by the arguments for doom and gloom - admittedly we are at an inflection point, and it will likely be resolved in a strong move - but it could be up as well as down. short term cycles point actually up right now, which means that if the market does not follow these cycles and rise into mid September, we will have proof that the market's character has changed and a big correction will likely occur. if it follows the direction of the short term cycle and the bond and dollar play along, everything's fine. regards, hb