SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Philosopher who wrote (54060)9/1/1999 10:50:00 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
But I've never seen her pose with a gun. Look at it from my perspective- all the big debacles with the government and firearms- WHO is holding the weapons? And who is holding the weapons pointed at the federal government? I mean really- it is just OBSERVATION. Some one told me to look in the paper- well guess who the gun toters are? We've been down this road before- but only with criminals and violence. I am betting with "socially acceptable" violence the stats are even more skewed for men to be right there. Hahahaha.



To: The Philosopher who wrote (54060)9/1/1999 11:00:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 108807
 
Hmm. The issue isn't really sensitivity, it's accuracy.

You said "women don't fight fair." I think that's inaccurate, which is why I was angry at you, especially because you claim to be a feminist. X said, "Guns don't kill people, MEN kill people (with a few exceptions). Is that accurate?

Don't you remember the last time we debated the relative propensities of the sexes for committing murder, it turned out that women were less likely than you thought, but more likely than she thought?

I think her statement is accurate, but hyperbolic and inflammatory. But I'd love to have a bumper sticker that says it.