SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (5855)9/2/1999 3:30:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Respond to of 54805
 
Lindy,

Intel has said they are ready to "push it"

Intel supports PC133
SDRAM, but only until
Rambus is ready

A service of Semiconductor Business News, CMP
Media Inc.
Story posted 9 a.m. EST/6 a.m., PST, 9/2/99

By Jack Robertson

PALM SPRINGS, Calif. -- Intel Corp. late
Wednesday made it official: the company will add
support to PC133 SDRAMs, citing the lack of rival
Direct Rambus DRAM availability in the near
future.

Peter MacWilliams, an Intel fellow, said the
endorsement of PC133 has no impact on the
transition to Direct RDRAM. "As soon as Direct
Rambus production ramps up, we expect to move
rapidly to the new memory chip," he told the Intel
Developers Forum.


He said that Intel's evaluation of PC133 indicated
that the SDRAM showed little performance
increase over existing PC100 chips. "However, it
will be widely available in the market and the
higher speed essentially comes at no extra
premium -- so why not use it?" he said.

The Intel memory official said the market will
ultimately determine how quickly the transition
from PC133 to Direct Rambus will take place.
"Intel strongly supports an early transition to
Direct Rambus," he said. "However, there are
market forces we don't control. We want to
remain flexible to provide what the market
wants."


MacWilliams scotched early industry reports that
Intel might develop a slightly different 133-MHz
spec, but will adopt the already-approved
industry PC133 standard. He cautioned, however,
that Intel still will study whether any interface
changes may be needed for the Intel chip set
supporting PC133.

He confirmed that Intel has dropped the hybrid
S-RIMM modules that could either use Direct
Rambus or SDRAM chips. Instead Intel will use
the Memory Translator Hub (MTH) as a switch on
the PC motherboard that can connect either
Direct RDRAM RIMMs or SDRAM DIMMs.

MacWilliams said no chip set has been identified
yet to support PC133. However, he asserted the
chip set selected will be solely for PC100/PC133
support and won't handle Direct Rambus.

He said Intel has no plans now to add any support
for Double Data Rate SDRAMs. "We've evaluated
DDR several times for desktops, and each time
decided not to support this memory," he said.

However, Intel is seriously considering adding
DDR support in its server chip sets, "based on
what our OEMs are telling us," he added. Intel's
DDR server interest may also be spurred by
yesterday's announcement by Reliance Computer
Corp. of San Jose that most major server OEMs
have endorsed its independent DDR-SDRAM chip
set (see Sept. 1 story).

MacWilliams denied that Intel will be late to
market with its PC133 chip set in the first half of
2000, despite several Taiwanese independents
announcing PC133 chip sets will be delivered
starting this fall. "Based on the volume ramp of
[PCs using] PC133 memory next year, our [chip
set] timing is about right."

The Intel official said the roadmap change to add
PC133 support wasn't due to any increased
performance of the SDRAM chip. "Basically, it is
lack of Direct RDRAM availability. We see PC133
as an interim memory co-existing with Direct
Rambus through 2001," he said.

Four memory producers will be in production on
128-megabit Direct RDRAMs in the third quarter
of 1999. That will increase to five the fourth
quarter and to eight suppliers in the first quarter
of 2000. MacWilliams said the first production of
256-Mbit Direct Rambus chips is expected by
two suppliers in the second quarter.