SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (70811)9/2/1999 5:35:00 PM
From: kapkan4u  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574061
 
A good article on DRDRAM/PC133:

eetimes.com

Kap



To: Process Boy who wrote (70811)9/2/1999 9:54:00 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574061
 
RE. <Do you know what Leff_n is for the current .18 process? It's pretty unbelievable. I mean, I really didn't believe it when I saw the number. But I am assured by those who are smarter than me that the number is real, and the calculation (based on measurement of C ) should be pretty close to how everyone else is doing it.

Probably around 850A-900A for the nominal .18um Intel process. Pretty small.

THE WATSONYOUTH


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News