Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (87664)	9/3/1999 12:11:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Respond to of 186894

Ten - Xeons heading to the low end in '00 I didn't catch this previously. Intel must be pretty confident in Merced. zdnet.com "The integrated cache will allow us to extend Xeon into the more affordable low end," said John Miner, vice president and general manager of the company's communications products group, during his keynote speech here Wednesday at the Intel (Nasdaq:INTC) Developer Forum." PB

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (87664)	9/3/1999 1:53:00 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Ten - Re: "Microslip. I like that, Paul." Good. Then you'll like this. {====================================} infoworld.com Microsoft acknowledges delay of Windows 2000 release candidate By Bob Trott InfoWorld Electric Posted at 5:18 PM PT, Sep 2, 1999 Microsoft put a happy face Thursday on its decision to delay the release of Release Candidate 2 (RC2) of Windows 2000, insisting the move would not hinder the company's efforts to ship final code by the end of 1999. While Microsoft continues to leave the door open for an early 2000 release for the upgrade to Windows NT 4.0, and sources say a January RTM is a serious possibility, the issue of when it ships is little more than a matter of pride for the software giant. Other than some participants in Microsoft's early deployment program, most IT shops have no plans to adopt Windows 2000 right off the bat anyway. "We're still not done converting Windows 3.1 workstations over to NT yet, though most of that is done, and there are much more serious issues coming up over the next several months, such as the year 2000 and 9/9/99 concerns," said Richard Steiner, senior applications analyst in the IS group at a major airline. "I suspect we don't care at all about Windows 2000 at this point in time, and won't until ISVs force us to upgrade again by discontinuing support for their Win32 product lines," Steiner said. Another IT expert said Windows 2000's Active Directory still has significant problems with issues such as Domain Name Services (DNS). "We don't want to bet on the server yet," said Al Williams, director of distributed systems services for Academic Computing at Pennsylvania State University. "We have had some problems with DNS and Active Directory will have to behave better than it has." "They finally did get Active Directory to work with an NT 4.0 domain [in RC1]," Williams said. "But I don't think they are out of the woods with it yet." RC2 was due out this week, but now the release will not surface until Sept. 15, at the earliest, sources said. Microsoft has scheduled a "Developer Day" event, which will center on Windows 2000, for that day. Keith White, marketing director for Microsoft's Business and Enterprise Division, said "nothing significant" was behind the delay, although he would not elaborate. He said RC2 would be released in September, but a planned Partners Day for OEMs and software makers would be postponed at least until October. "We are still on track for '99," White said, "but if the quality is not there people will not mind it slipping a little bit." Based in Redmond, Wash., Microsoft Corp. is at www.microsoft.com . Bob Trott is InfoWorld's Seattle bureau chief. InfoWorld editor at large Ed Scannell contributed to this article. {====================================} Does ANYBODY REMEMBER that this product was called Windows NT 5.0 and was supposed to be DELIVERED in mid-1998 ? This is going to be a TWO YEAR SLIP - and the news media KILLED INTEL for slipping Merced a mere 6 months ! Paul