Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Howard C. who wrote (47933)	9/3/1999 10:58:00 AM
From: E'Lane	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Of course I realized that old message was an exaggeration, but taken in the context of other messages that day, it was part of the general hoopla, DGIV had issued news THAT DAY about how they were going to review the 10-SB form at the trade show. Another outlight, blatent, lie on their part. IMO. Ohhhhhh...so that's it?? Well, perhaps you need to either link the "blast from the past" from now on so we can appreciate the context from which it was taken and apply it to the present day situation -OR- you could copy/paste what it is that makes it apply -OR- you could not do either and just not review the past. Let it die. Either/or...fine with me. <g> I thought Partha's post made very good sense. Funny, you argued with him by saying . I don't have the slightest idea what you are talking about them kicking dirt in the face of the SEC or counsel. Yet you went on to clarify to yourself. (the IBD ads in the middle of an SEC investigation) Grrrrrrr...how could everyone be so dang angry at each other on the eve of a long weekend off? Me? I'm happy as a moosette in a Pokeman store! <g> I can see clearly now,the rain is gone, and all that malarky! Take Care, Howard...spread the sugar! E!..thinking "Open season on E's" will soon be upon us.

To: Howard C. who wrote (47933)	9/3/1999 11:14:00 AM
From: ChatterjeeP	Respond to of 50264

Howard: You have a way with words. I know that DGIV has not done prudent things in the past. But, they need to and are trying to do the prudent thing (I hope): Satisfy SEC silently with all the documents they need and wait for their green signal before publishing any news. You can kick that dead horse that they should have done things differently. Well, they have not; what they control now is future and present. We can hope that they have learned from their mistakes. What I was saying is: this avowed silence on their part should not be definitely construed as sinister. That's all. Please do not go on the "history says differently". If you are so sure that DGIV is not ever going to mend its ways and they have done absolutely the most heathen and evil deeds in the past and they are just fiddling with telephone cables in the playboy studio next door, then, for heaven's sake, $0.25 is the max price they are going to fetch ever when the truth comes out. If this were my belief, I would jump on 25cents. Most of us (I hope) believe that yes, DGIV has made mistakes in the past, which we have complained about then and they said it is OK (we are frustrated about that). But, if they do have business, they are trying to mend their fences and will have to show to us the truth and whole truth. We think the truth may not be as rosy as it seemed last year but will still merit a value better than we will get now on Canadian shores. Harping on the past will not do any good. We can only hope for prudent and professional action on DGIV's part in FUTURE. As I said, if I absolutely and positively believed that DGIV is NEVER going to do that, I shall chew on that 25c carrot they are dangling in Canada and call it a gourmet feast. Champagne or Sham-Pain? Partha