Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: oilbabe who wrote (50379)	9/3/1999 4:00:00 PM
From: BigBull	Respond to of 95453

Oilbabe - Yeah but who exactly is Reuters quoting? One of our now infamous Analysts? I seem to recall a recent period when oil slid from 19 to 16 when an analyst suggested that a certain South American country was "cheating". Subsequently we learned that suggestion was based on, ahem, faulty information derived from unreliable sources. Note: I'm not mentioning names, dates, nor am I using terms such as "fraudulent" as I wouldn't want to get sued for libel. <g> However, I would advise anybody to take anything said by "analysts" with a huge grain of salt - especially if they have an axe to grind. Caveat - Any and all allusion to names, dates, events, or countries in this post are purely fictional and do NOT represent any connection to real names, dates, events, or countries.

To: oilbabe who wrote (50379)	9/3/1999 4:02:00 PM
From: A. Geiche	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 95453

Oilbabe - Petrologistics are probably wrong: quote.bloomberg.com There is nothing wrong in being wrong, however.. Even Slider may be wrong..