SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: grok who wrote (71021)9/4/1999 1:47:00 PM
From: Charles R  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573458
 
KZ,

<How much does MTH degrade performance?>

We are waiting for answers on that one but as a point of referance VIA and RCC are winning PC133 design wins against rumored Camino/PC133.

<How many drdrams will there actually be in the near term? How many PC models with Rambus are actually in the pipeline for fall? >

Intel is not likely to ship a lot of CuMines in Q4 because of logistics. Right now, Intel is going flat out (units wise) to make Q3/Q4. If they build too many CuMine and can't ship them out for whatever reason, they are hosed. So, I am sure most of the builds for Q3/Q4 are PIIIs (500-600 MHz). I have points of reference that traingulate CuMines to about 2 Mu for Q3 and 5Mu for Q4(ex:I have a good feel for other components being sold to Intel for Camino motherboards. Mind you - these are *motherboard* build plans - not ship plans. And motherboard ships precede CPU ships)

<How many have been decommitted from Rambus recently and what are they switching to? >

Hard to answer other than to say that - a LOT. To the best of my knowledge only Dell is endorsing RDRAM for Q4 - I would be surprised if they ship too many in any case.

<What is going on inside Intel? >

My contacts report chaos.

<What are they telling OEMs behind closed doors? >

Until a few weeks back it was Camino with PC133. I do not know the position du jour.

<What the hell is going on around here???????????>

Beat me. May be Intel has this massive campaign to confuse the hell out of OEMs and end customers till they get their things in control ;-)

Chuck



To: grok who wrote (71021)9/4/1999 2:52:00 PM
From: Pravin Kamdar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573458
 
KZNerd,

Funny you asked:

theregister.co.uk

Pravin.



To: grok who wrote (71021)9/4/1999 4:07:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 1573458
 
<How would Coppermine+MTH+PC100 compare in performance to Athlon?>

I've heard a rumor that MTH using PC100 was pretty poor in performance. As for PC133, I have no idea how Intel is going to support that, whether it's through MTH or not. I always thought that if any chipset could use PC133, it would be the 810e.

Tenchusatsu