Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Giordano Bruno who wrote (67271)	9/5/1999 1:31:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

JJ, I saw the piece and commented on it earlier on the thread. Pure sophistry.

To: Giordano Bruno who wrote (67271)	9/5/1999 4:22:00 PM
From: Sid Turtlman	Respond to of 132070

jjsirius: A thread got started on SI to discuss the Glassman and Hassett Dow 36,000 theory. I gave my reasons why it is garbage in this post: Message 11164837

To: Giordano Bruno who wrote (67271)	9/5/1999 8:33:00 PM
From: LTK007	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

in one quote from the book by James Glassman and Kevin Hassett they say "Stock Prices could double,trible or even quadruple tomorrow and still not be too high". O my o my o my I detect an ever expanding divergence is the logic quotient versus the mania qoutient. We have Yardeni,in Barrons,with logic modestly suggesting "Now Dow 8000?" and then at the mania extreme we have two berserkers getting a featured discussion of their "Dow 36,000" in the New York Times(Sunday edition even:) my seismograph is detecting heavy activity in the stock market fault lines:) When we have point- counter point like this on the same weekend in two major publications we,I quietly hazard, are getting closer and closer to fault line slippage---will it be a 5 or 10 on the richter scale of market histories(LOL!) Max90