SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Truth about Waco -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: C Kahn who wrote (568)9/5/1999 1:31:00 AM
From: James F. Hopkins  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1449
 
OK ; About Waco I was replying to
Re> In my personal and humble opinion, the Administration would have had to acknowledge that they made a mistake if they pulled the ATF out. <<
and it went like
Message 11163913
But I forgot to add
Right behind >>
Did you know that the ATF was out at Fort Hood training for this
particular raid ( not sure of the time spent I'd have to look it up
but I think I remember it being over a month,) prior to the raid
they had a complete mock up of the Branch Dividian complex out
there and did 20 practice runs.


The allegation that were trying to serve a search warrant is
a little thin, It turned out in the Trial of the Davidians
That the ATF Did NOT have a search warrant with them.
None of them even knew where it was, not one.

I don't know how they could be trying to serve something they
did not have. To this day no one has produced a search warrant
that I know of.

Some people are mistaking calling a long Affidavit for a
search warrant , "the search warrant" but it's not,
& I'm not sure one was issued, and if it was how can I now
tell if they didn't do that after the fact and back date it ?
Reno said she had ordered one sealed ( very odd ) but all that
aside, they didn't have one when they went to pull the Raid.
And no one I know of so far, ever even saw one before or after the raid.
----------
Jim