SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Truth about Waco -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bob Lao-Tse who wrote (579)9/5/1999 8:57:00 AM
From: chalu2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1449
 
Historical analogies are interesting, but possibly inapplicable to our nuclear age. If these were Roman times, a weakened Russia would have fallen to the US, China, or other invaders. Their nuclear arsenal makes this impossible. If the Romans had nuclear weapons and surveillance aircraft at their disposal, it is doubtful barbarians would've gotten to the gates of the city and beyond.



To: Bob Lao-Tse who wrote (579)9/5/1999 8:58:00 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Respond to of 1449
 
To say that Rome was invaded by barbarians is a little misleading. It was more a civil war than an invasion. Popular history gives the impression of Alaric the Chieftan gathering his clan to assault Rome from the north. Alaric was a noble of Gothic blood. At 18 years of age he was put in command of an auxiliary force recruited from the Goths. He was a Roman officer commissioned by Emperor Theodosius, and when Theodosius marched into Gaul against the usurper Eugenius, he counted Alaric's division as among the most faithful of his army.

I could go on and on about this, but I have to get ready for Mass.

Briefly put, Alaric was an ambitious Roman general who took advantage of divisions within society to rebel against the central authority and advance his own cause. I'd love to get into why society was divided (it was not corrupted by an effete sensuality as is popularly depicted) but I gotta go.