Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Zi-Corp (ZICA), formerly MCUAF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: A@P Trader who wrote (1284)	9/5/1999 9:14:00 AM
From: Softechie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2082

A@P tell your "MASTER" to to bring out the reasons why he doesn't like this company. Otherwise YOU GUYS JUST LIKE DUMB AND DUMBER. Warmest regards ps: you're just a messenger and have no clues about this company.

To: A@P Trader who wrote (1284)	9/5/1999 10:31:00 AM
From: CocoBob	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2082

We're all here to make money right. Regardless if you're long or short. The longs are expected to post substance, not b.s. or vague innuendo. The shorts are expected to do same. Come back after talking to your master and when you're big enough to talk facts - we're all open minded here. So far based on facts on this thread Zi is LONG and a good investment.

To: A@P Trader who wrote (1284)	9/5/1999 5:38:00 PM
From: Diogeron	Respond to of 2082

Let's put this debate into perspective: I "nailed" Iridium, if you mean by that I made a big profit and bailed, and I don't pretend to be all that insightful. Pardon the pun, but it didn't take a rocket scientist to see that one coming. The point I would like to make is that there should be an implicit rule for posting on threads that says unless one provides some evidence or, at least, "good reasons" to support one's position (short or long) then we should spare everyone the banter about who is right to be long and who is wrong to be short, ad infinitum.