SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Dutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (7663)9/5/1999 11:00:00 AM
From: Enigma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 81259
 
But the bears are wrong of course - you don't have to be a bull or 'goldbug' to understand that - they are wrong because gold is overwhelmingly the largest reserve asset. And I have never bought into the idea that the CBs are trying to get rid of their gold - some of the weak sisters have been sellers but they are in the very small minority - bit players really - the only exception being the B of E - and they are playing a dicey game IMO and time will tell. The IMF sales seem to be off and the Swiss - who knows? The spotlight is on them now. But if you look at the big picture you don't see evidence of a mass exodus from gold. But why let the facts get in the way of an opinion?



To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (7663)9/5/1999 11:06:00 AM
From: goldsheet  Respond to of 81259
 
> But if gold indeed now is jsut another commodity to them, then they
> should have no problem with production cuts

This is probably true for everyone except Barrick. They know they are going to get $375 for the next 13 million ounces. They have reduced cash costs from $182 in 1997 to $160 in 1998 and have a target of $125 for 1999. Production has gone from 700,000 ounces per quarter to over 1 million ounces, which reduces total costs per ounce (spreads fixed costs over more ounces) They are going to have a lot of cash on the balance sheet in the next few years - wonder who they will buy ?