To: ed who wrote (29160 ) 9/5/1999 1:00:00 PM From: Mitch Blevins Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
ed, your post jumps around like a jackrabbit from one unrelated topic to the next. I'll have to split it up to make some sense of it...Well, When a product(s) is bundled with other product, you can call they are free or they are not , and which is part of the price of the total package, depending on how you call it. For me , I will continue to pay less than $100 ( say, upgrade every four to five year) every year to use the Microsoft Office, because 1) Less than $100 is a very small portion of my budget 2) I want to use a software which most people are using 3) Trust, Microsoft will continue to improve its product with deep pocket, and I want to use a product of quality and which will be continue improved from time to time, and guarantee compatibility as office being improved continuously and new features being added. Yes, Star office may be competible today , then how about tomorrow or two years from now when the new features of Microsoft Office and Microsoft other products being added? Should I switch back to Microsoft Office again then? You make very good points for why someone who already uses MS Office may want to stay with it instead of trying a competitor such as StarOffice. But the market is expanding, and MSFT must also capture all the new users who have never owned an Office Suite before. With Internet Explorer, MSFT has shown that including it on newly purchased computers is very effective at capturing the new-user market. It seems logical that most computer OEMs will now be including StarOffice on the computers they sell, and why not?... it is free after all. It is not clear that MSFT can lower the price of MSOffice to a point where OEMs will include it and still keep a hold of that wonderful 40% revenue/50% profit... especially with the price of computers falling into the $500 range. Also, once the expanding market begins using something other than MSOffice, all your compatibility arguments become moot.And at that time how can I convert the Star Office based file to Microsoft Office's format? If I can't, then I am completely skewed up. Since StarOffice will save data into MSOffice format, I assume it will be as compatible as if you had upgraded from an earlier version of MSOffice.SUNW is frighten to death at this moment on the eve that Mercede 64 bit processor is ready to be released with powerful NT OS. Most of the companies will switch to the new system as far as I know, because the Unix system is hard to use for most of the non computer professionals, even the professionals, and need a lot of training. But for Window based system , is a different story, because we all use WIN 98 at home , at work and in school. I am afraid a lot Unix folks will lose their jobs as a result, that is why we have so many Microsoft haters on this thread. Uhh.. I thought we were talking about Office Suites. ;-) Well, for Bill's sake I hope you are right about the wild success of "Mercede". They sure do seem to be betting the whole boat on just one architecture. All the competition has their eggs spread out across several chips.Sunw' Java will not fly at all, because 90% of the PC are using Microsoft's window, not Unix I thought Java was meant to run on both Windows PCs and Unix. :)and CE is a simplified version of Microsoft Window, and no compatability problem when talk to PCs. Most reviewers seem to think the Palms sync better with Windows, but I'm sure you've done your own testing and concluded otherwise. Funny how the Palms also sync well with other operating systems, in addition to Windows. -Mitch